Current:Home > MyA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -Streamline Finance
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-16 05:27:27
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (731)
Related
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- 76ers guard Kelly Oubre Jr. struck by vehicle while walking, expected to miss major time
- Israel prepares for Euro 2024 qualifying game at Kosovo amid tight security measures
- A fragile global economy is at stake as US and China seek to cool tensions at APEC summit
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Indi Gregory, sick baby at center of legal battle in Britain, dies
- Kendra Wilkinson Full of Gratitude After Undergoing Treatment for Depression and Anxiety
- Al Roker says his family protected him from knowing how 'severe' his health issues were
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- At least 2 million poor kids in the U.S. have lost Medicaid coverage since April
Ranking
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Texas A&M fires coach Jimbo Fisher, a move that will cost the school $75M
- Man facing charges after car chase, shooting that wounded Pennsylvania officer
- Ohio GOP lawmakers vow to target state judiciary after passage of Issue 1 abortion measure
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Houston Astros set to name bench coach Joe Espada manager, succeeding Dusty Baker
- ‘We want her back:' The husband of a US journalist detained in Russia appeals for her release
- NC State stuns No. 2 UConn, beating Huskies in women's basketball for first time since 1998
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Slipknot's ex-drummer Jay Weinberg hints at firing, says he's 'heartbroken and blindsided'
Fantasy football waiver wire Week 11 adds: 5 players you need to consider picking up now
US Rhodes scholars selected through in-person interviews for the first time since COVID pandemic
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Saving Brazil’s golden monkey, one green corridor at a time
US Rhodes scholars selected through in-person interviews for the first time since COVID pandemic
Long walk to school: 30 years into freedom, many kids in South Africa still walk miles to class